Fictional Googology Wiki
Advertisement
Limitary Number
∀ 0+ is claimed to be un-surpassible by its creator!
"no I meant that number is actually the biggest" "Oh"
Former Largest Number
∀ 0+ has once been the largest number on this wiki, but has been surpassed by a different number.
"The Ultimate Trans-transcendental Definitive-Conceptual-Argumentative Limit is an entry on the Fictional Googology Wiki that outranks all others in terms of hypothetical pseudo-hyper-quantification." - Ultimate Trans-transcendental Definitive Conceptual Argumentative Limit
The Box



0+ is an experiment based on limitant thought.

Definition[]

Definition will be made using an analogy in order to assue full writability.

Take an infinite brain and put it on a computer; the brain will know everything inside the computer, limited by it yet still essentially limitless, like the concepts we can create.

Now, a BSOD happens. This is outside the realm of what the brain can understand; everything that it could possibly ever think of, it's gone, yet it had to understand something, at the very least; something like that should hypothetically be the strongest concept it could possibly ever process.

Analysis[]

0+ is in all sense, completely informal, being verbally informalisable. This means, there is no actual way to write it out, as its definition would extend up to infinite paragraphs of text.

As for what this encompasses, Verbal Informality is an idea of something that can't be defined formally as that makes it ridge some rules.

0+ can be defined as "the biggest concept," but if you go tell that "the biggest concept" is bigger than anything on FG they would call you an idiot and ask you to give it more definition. The thing is, no one can, but that's because you can't verbally formalize it, because the genuine definition of ∀0+ would be literally endless, as it implies a limit on the things we could understand as writers. It is verbally informal.

Consider it like Infinity. If a kid says "what's the bigger number?" and the other kid responds "Infinity," it is completely wrong and it has no validity, but if one were to genuinely define it, they would need to write an endless amount of numbers consecutively to express their idea.

0+ is in essence, the largest concept that is not verbally informal, and it is completely inaccesible using any other kind of technique that can be verbally formal, such things like any cata-variant of some sort of concept. In order to go further, one must create more verbally informal concepts, almost in the same way one once went beyond the types of infinity, but not directly equal, because that would be Puposeful Misinterpretation, and it is not demonstrated nor provable this works.

Trivia[]

  • This concept exists since 2022.
  • It is used by SammySpore to denote the n-limit of his array notation, BEEF.
  • It is expected to be the largest number that follows the condition of it's most amibgious definition and most complex one being the exact same.
    • So, currently the only value applicable to Kurante's Constant.
  • In Hyperological standards, this is stated to be the limit of it. Anything larger was considered "SuperHyperology."
  • Just like every concept beyond fiction, it's true form doesn't exist.
Advertisement