UCoS was powerful that it (almost) properly breaks the definitional, conceptual and axiomatic worlds in 3-meta. But you didn't realize. All analyticals are transcended from concepts to analyses. This includes limits, positions, propers, and other analyticals.
Analytic Metatum
Most Analytic Metatum entries precede this entry.
0: START
To begin, we must take a step forward beyond what we can define and analyze entries (even for a proper scale called "positions"). We can analyze analyticals instead without abusing analyticals. Any attempt to abuse (such as conditioning, restricting, delimiting, tricking; those will be covered) will lead to a roadblock.
Propers are transformed into analytical, thanks to a subconcept called "properly." After the incident of Utmost Comeback of Stricts and GODMODE: Creativity, analysis is no longer confined and bounded to logic and analyticals are detached from the conceptual domain.
I: LIMITS
Limits and recurrences can be analytical (on done properly) by having their positions. Methods of limits include: Restrictions, breakages, Zander's Conceptual Limits, and more. Because limits became analytical, all limits to analysis wouldn't work.
Examples:
- Examples of limit positions:
- Given a scenario where one breaks logic (like "GODMODE: Creativity" did), analyses, or analyticals, it still can be analyzed as a limit.
- Terminators are a subtype of limits that told by Thien: Properly ends a series of X, where X is any concept that can be put in a set.
- Absolutisms are a subtype of limits that strictly or totally end something.
- "Limited to" conditions are a subtype of restrictions and limits.
- For analytical correspondence: we can analyze that some things are analyzed to something.
- Stop Making (__) Please: They are limits to certain concepts.
- The (__) End of Numbers: Intended to be the largest but however are also limits in various ways and catches.
- Examples of recurrence positions:
- Counterrestrictions restrict normal restrictions and can also nullify affected restrictions.
- The unbreaking unbreaks every single concept and breaks "breaking."
- Those two actions are non-restrictions under "GODMODE: Creativity."
II: POSITIONS
Analyses can provide proper scales (called positions). For anything implied to or properly have a value by any set of Entirallisms (including Empiricals, Verustics+, Reservatives, Myriads, ...) and/or ordering methods (analytical or not; like hierarchies based on valuelessness), that value is a position.
An analytical hierarchy has positions on entries. With analyticals (including analytical "greater than") and methods utilized to sort, analysis can hierarchize over... everything. Regardless of equivalents and correspondences: Something in a hierarchy has a position under there.
Examples:
- Reservative Clause implies that all statements and entries have their positions (regardless of any type).
- Analytical Ordinality is a proper order of analysis.
- Like scales may include orders, positions may include proper orders. Orders are to scale anything to any extent.
- And no, analyticals are not dependent on Analytical Ordinality, but rather given from analysis itself.
- "Postnumerals" (even a type which objects properly have no "values") properly have positions (above a limit position about values) under a postnumeral, concept-based, or property-based hierarchy (with postnumeric properties).
- Everything under a empirical hierarchy properly have positions under there.
II.a: Positional Theory
Positions are static, analytical, and independent to all limits (as positions). No positions are limited under a “limiter” / "positional" absolutism because any abuse like "properly" breaking positions would be refuted that it is a limit with its proper position.
III: PROPERTIES
Properties are analytical qualities that a concept holds (including positions). An object can be analyzed for properties that it holds.
Examples:
- For an object that is properly a non-restriction (property from GM:C), it was done by analysis.
- All objects that can't be implied to have a value instead can properly have other properties like Illogical.
All assumptions are disregarded by analytical truths (as a greater extent of actuality). On analysis of an object, it would be proper or not (as analytical forms of "true or false").
- Conditions are superseded by analytical truths because prior entries force conditions (as axioms) until "GODMODE: Creativity."
IV: ANALYSES
Properlies are given by analysis, as to explain everything including entries, concepts, and analyticals.
There are greater things that will be explained by analysis.
- Proper relatives are relatives for what makes sense.
- For example, GM:C "breaks" logic but however in a proper relative to this entry.
- Conclusive analysis resolves resolvable things with "proper" solutions (as analytical).
GENERALIZATION
"Many things are transformed into analyticals..."
Analysis can make up more analyticals, but there's no need to conceptualize! Imagine a concept gets analyzed with infinite analyticals. That's gorgeous!
We can categorize analyticals into categories that are "unbreakable" thanks to analysis. After analysis, concepts rarely get superseded by or transformed into analytical forms.
Analytic Triagonalization
Given with infinite details and inference: Analytic Triagonalization is the exhaustive point after every analytical about every entry, concept, and then analytical.
Analysis
This entry is about the concept analysis of analyticals and discover the generalization of analyticals. An analytical statement about something is a part of analyzing something.
Supertask
On each analysis, analyses can always find more statements, analyticals, and properties at an infinite extent. For example, an analysis can discover a loophole-based clause about analyticals:
"All analyticals are independent of all proper positions (properties given with analysis), disregarding whether to limit and recur by analytical statements about limits and recurrences."
The category of unique analyticals would grow per analysis. Yet, there are infinite remaining statements about an entry to be discovered by analysis. That means Analytic Triagonalization is a exhaustive point after doing that supertask.
Solutions
Analysis can give solutions to things, especially to resolve what can't be previously analyzed. Solutions are analytical resolutions. Objects through solutions would not be close to Analytic Metatums, as those and solutions are later be properly limited.
How to surpass?
Here are 4 steps to reach Analytic Metatums and Analytic Triagonalization. The first step is already done at Class 39. Thus, making Analytic Metatums hard as Excistris.
Find out that analyticals are only given by analysis.(omitted by Class 39)- Find out that limit-based entries can be analyzed for analytical-type limits.
- Categorize and generalize analyticals through analysis. (to Analytic Metatums)
- Realize that we are analyzing all entries, concepts, and analyses. (to Analytic Triagonalization)
To surpass Analytic Triagonalization, I give three ways:
- Analyze that analyticals and analyses are caused by something else.
- Surpassable by entries based on anything, not just analysis-based.
- Separate more things from entries, concepts, and analyses. For example, we can separate breakings and methods from these.
...
You look back to the past.
- The Seam of Totality was attained after everything is carefully analyzed and done properly.
- Analysis disregards its order (as a position). Entries are analyzed with positions and categorized into analytical categories.
- Concepts (including "analysis") are next. Analysis founded all breakage and recurrence positions of those.
- Because analyticals are transcended from just being "conceptuals," analysis finally analyzes at least analyticals.