Continuous loose-limit[]
Continuous loose-limit (CLL for short) is the limit where all forms of continuity become lost. This may sound similar to Absolute Undiagonalizable, but this is actually unrelated. It's also past RP-Lock, so it wouldn't be an undiagonalizable regardless.
Definition[]
The CLL is the lowest point at which all of continuity as a whole stops entirely. You can not go past this point, and this is meant in a completely uncollapseable way that holds absolutely true. The only reason some points are past this point is via loopholes (that will be discussed in their respective pages/sections of pages). This doesn't just mean you can't add 1 to it, it also means you literally can not add 1 under any circumstance or logical field, including it-logic and hypothetical things above it-logic. Even via some hypothetical superior logic to it-logic, you wouldn't be able to pass this point. You also can't multiply this point, exponentiate this point, or apply any function whatsoever to it. The biggest difference between this and Absolute Undiagonalizable is that AU could be reached via Rediagonalization systems, though indirectly. This point is unreachable by any system like that, as there is no point past this where continuity "continues" onwards again. The exact definition of this point goes on exactly as long as the point itself, as there is no simpler way to define it. Due to the previous points, it's exact definition is obviously unobservable, even via the entire observational field as a whole. However, unlike the previous observational limits, this point's definition, even if it were observable under any form of logic (which it isn't), would be unreadable. If it could somehow be read (it can't), it would prevent itself from being read. If you could prevent it from preventing itself from being read (you can't), you would likely die after reading an infinitesimal of a single symbol contained within the exact definition. Even if you didn't die (you would), or get any kind of injury or brain damage (you would), it would be just straight up incomprehensible, and too long to be contained whatsoever.
This point also refers to higher tiers of observation. For example, the Observational Loose Limits only prevented observation. Observational Field Limits prevented the entire observation field. Imagine Observation Loose Limits were tier 1, and Observation Field Limits were tier 2. This would be tier itself. It would be less than a hypothetical Observation-Lock, since we aren't even at Observational Basic Limit yet, but it would still be utterly ginormous and incomprehensibly larger than any previous observational limits.