I was so bored from not knowing what to do during summer that I decided to spend around 5 hours making one...
Intro[]
Any type of number is confined to us as human's definition. No matter what it is, we are creating a new "universe" about numbers. This "universe" has the logic of whatever we define it to be. I'm not going to go and make another generic limit number. I am going to not create a number period. I am going to do something we never thought of doing.
Let's start by doing the basis[]
We know that everything stated before is true. We say we are limited by "real life" and apparently we are. Even if it makes no sense it will be allowed because we are creating our own logic. It does not have to make sense from the definition of real life. So why are we limited by it? If we are stuck in real life (Which we are) and you escape into fiction. Is the fiction limited to the reality or are YOU limited to the reality? You cannot say anything is true in real life but when it comes to fiction literally anything and everything is possible. The only things limited to that fiction is the laws of that world in the fiction. If a fiction is limited to reality so be it.
Wait what?[]
Nobody has stated that you cannot make a fiction or logic in a number and make things in that numbers logic or fiction. However, people default to saying that is "impossible" and using the catafilm to do whatever is necessary to make the number lose its potential. Even if you can bypass the catafilm the catafilm is a part of the logic in our definition of logic in this realm of numbers. So why are we able to remove logic entirely? With that logic this number will be cata-whatevered to make it lower because people have subjectivity. And you already know where I am going with this. If we can negate the catafilm even if it is "impossible" then going beyond knowledge even if it is "impossible" is possible. Same with going beyond real-life and the box or whatever. The box is not affected by the catafilm and yet it is still exactly the same as every other logic of limits. Yet we say we are limited by the box or whatever when in reality we are not.
Ruh roh[]
If the catafilm is truly a limit then the catafilm should do whatever the hell it is required to do. Not target specific numbers. Even if YOU created the catafilm you shouldn't be not limited to it. You should be limited by what you created. You cannot say you are not. And, even if you define something in YOUR subjectivity to make YOUR subjective claims the normal. Then you are lying and if you ignore this statement you should re-read what your numbers that are "Not limited by the catafilm" are actually limited by the catafilm. You just don't want to acknowledge this because humans do what humans think.
Screw your limits[]
If this number is limited by the catafilm how is it? The catafilm or "cataflection" does not effect this. As this abides to the logic of this number and not other numbers that effect this. Stop being dumb and read your own definition. The definition of cataflection is "When an object attributes a property that does not conform to the logic of similar objects to itself. The opposite of this term is an autological object." How about we cataflect cataflection then? Screw the catafilm! The catafilm can be considered "impossible" by the logic you are giving it. Actually read the definition I put instead of just saying it is cataflected because yes. Look at the definitions carefully and stop being so subjective!
Logic defying is a yes[]
Nothing is "Impossible" as we are defining what is possible. If you try to put a limit of what we can say is possible you're immediately false. WE are defining what is possible and what is not. If you want to define logic that is fine, but actually pay attention to the logic put on the definition instead of your subjective view on it. Say why your cata-whatevering the number and ask the creators POV on the number. If you disagree ask someone else. Don't just say something is false because you say it is.
Anyways back to what I was going to say before going and ranting about being pissed about logic defying shit[]
We can say whatever our number is. That's the point of fiction, we can do whatever we want depending on the logic. And given the logic on this specific topic "real life" is beyond this. This is true apparently, but if fiction is going beyond real life you have a false statement. You cannot go beyond the thing containing the thing. Catafilm do something! Of course nothing will happen to the catafilm after this because of subjectivity and whatnot. But to get back on topic. I will now say what my number is.
Definition[]
Where logic is defining what is possible and what is not. This number is not bound to logic. Nothing stops this number from being not bound from logic (unless it's made by a 7 year old and defies common sense). If you try to say you cannot go beyond logic then prove it. Nobody said it was impossible to go beyond logic itself. WE are defining the logic here, I can do whatever the hell I want if it is not yet defined. So I will say it is possible. This is also not effected by the catafilm because 1. The catafilm is limited by logic and it is defining what is possible IN logic. 2. This number follows it's OWN logic and is not in a subjective view. If it is affected by catafilm then it defies its own logic which is affected by the catafilm itself. Meaning it is impossible to effect this number by the catafilm without creating a paradoxical question.
If you try to say this number is not truely beyond logic because it has it's own logic then you are wrong. It is specifically not bound by logic other than it's own. Preventing the use of people saying things are "impossible" when in reality they are the ones defining it. Nothing can affect this number as it is bound to its own logic meaning it is impossible to affect it using logic set by another number or function. If this number stated it was bound by other logic then whatever. But for this number specifically it is false