Entirallism Levels (as named by JoshuaDR.0809) are a set of entry measurement systems. Currently there's 6 methods.
Visuals (EL1)[]
Definition[]
Visuals are the first Entirallism Level, the requirement being that you have to see it in order to count.
This later got broken by OBL and also the JTTAEON series.
Actuals (EL2)[]
Definition[]
Actuals are the next Entirallism Level, with the definition of "By reason of technicality, it must count." This classification is based arounds facts. These haven't been ranked yet.
Trivia[]
- Actuals used to have the definition of "Actuals are "X by Technicality" and uses the same paradoxical ignorance for AI to ignore all forms of breakages."[1] The "paradoxical" ignorance part has been removed since then.
- This is Thien's first breakology class.
Literals (EL3)[]
Definition[]
Literals are the third Entirallism, being defined as "It must be literally, realistically, and physically has to be that, for it to count." In analysis, it can be resembled as "actual" actions (real-life relative).
Trivia[]
- Literals have their own FG wiki page, see here: Literals
- The spiritual successor (or rather, extension) to Literals are Verustics, which are defined in Abspiral Sorfatis ~ Ikkai.
Propers (EL4)[]
Definition[]
Propers are perhaps the most well-defined ones out of the entire list. It's definition is "Must be logical in order to count. Breakages makes the concept nonrecurrable."
Subconcepts[]
As propers get expanded, several FGists managed to make propers analytical, which shows that "properly true" requires analysis instead of logic. Additionally, a recent Idealogy, "Properology", was found as the conceptual and analytical study of propers.
Properlies[]
"Properly" is an adjective term used to explain things on analysis.
Proper Relatives[]
Proper Relatives are a variant of relatives that things can only make sense to a given object.
Recurrences[]
Recurrences can recur things that aren't meant to be broken. There are infinite workarounds and loopholes to recur in another way, such as nullifying restrictions and extending a concept.
Stricts (EL5)[]
Definition[]
Stricts are a ill-defined classification being defined as "It strictly and definitively has to be that for it to count. No ifs, ands, or buts."
In other words, Stricts are the limit of "tricks", which is defined as below.
Tricks[]
Tricks are the base for this EL, being defined as any attempt to defy or surpass something. As there's infinitely many ways to defy, Stricts are ill-defined.
Here's a short list of example tricks:
- "If, ands, or buts."
- Continuations
- Asymptotes
- Delineations
- Disprovements
- Breakology
- Pata- (any kind of ineffability)
- Cata- (any kind of impossibility)
Trivia[]
- Stricts also has it's own page, check it out here: Stricts.
- Utmost Comeback of Stricts buffs stricts to a much higher level and is also the reason I personally believe Stricts are ill-defined.
- There was a planned LTS version to Stricts however that has been scrapped.
Empiricals (EL6)[]
And that brings us to today, the latest Entirallism Level by Gamma Mu D Mu.
Definition[]
Now I can't really find a solid definition for Empiricals, but it's roughly defined as "Empiricals turn something into the author's interpretation of that thing."
Gamma's true definition[]
The above is somewhat simplified. Just watch the video I made exactly for this reason: https://youtu.be/I6f9Usrvn1Y?si=dLS5T3GiFoLHHARc