nah I’d lose[]
note: none of this is accurate even with an beyond absolute omniscient omnivastance times the googology loop absolute true Omni infinity iq I couldn’t explain how weak and small this thing is
Welcome to fodder this is an attempt to make a thing smaller than all
why fodder is so “fodder”[]
Technically this number isn’t even fodder because it’s below every possible & impossible concept and nonconcepts of fodder
Fodder is the smallest thing that it is below every possible,impossible,transpossible,observable,non-observable,transobservable…(etc)ly small numbers,concepts,non-concepts,trans 0 concepts and nonconcepts,etc (below negative).
fodder will never get to negative , positive or even to the concept of a number no matter how much you multiple and square it.
it will always stay small and below all concepts of fodder,weak,small,negative,low,etc and will never be close to any concept of big,huge,massive,etc or any numbers in the middle (fodder is not weak and that’s because he’s below every possible & impossible concept of weak)
fodder is not a number not because it’s beyond numbers it’s because it’s below every concept and non-concept of numbers
fodder is not on the map of numbers, again not because it’s beyond all concepts of it or something. It’s because it’s below all concepts and non-concepts of it
definition of the word fodder[]
Fodder is derived from the phrase cannon fodder. Its when a character is so weak compared to another that's there's literally nothing they could do against them except for getting hit and dying.
dont be confused this is not the fodder from google it’s the fodder from powerscaling
weird stuff with fodder[]
fodder < fodder
- fodder is way smaller than itself
- it gets smaller every second
- also anything >>>>>>>>>> fodder
dont[]
Negative The continuum? Still smaller you don’t know what fodder is if you don’t know about it then don’t talk about it with wrong stuff
Also fodder isn’t negative it is below the concept,non-concept,etc of omninegative numbers