"We've merely reached the foothills of something much greater, a level that separates you and it by the same way infinity is to zero. This whole entire trek towards the empirical summit was just the tutorial, the anthill. This is the bottom of the mountain."
Infinite Imaginary Systems (IIS) is a set of all undiscoverable trans-pataphysical relative systems that cannot be collapsed to observation at any level. This entry is purely theoretical, and is basically my interpretation of what Istamtae's "OBL+" is meant to be. This is also meant to be able to break the record holding streak that the Observational limit entry is trying to keep up forever, however it is true that at one point or another it will be broken.
Overview[]
There are systems, which do not exist, that cannot be collapsed to the level of "existence" that the Observational Limit shares. No matter how many collapses of any magnitude, of any variation, they cannot be reduced to such level. Even though that must be impossible, there is no way to theorize such systems or infer that they can be reduced, because all such attempts are contradictory and are still bound to the Noosphere (realm of human consciousness and thought). No effort can be made of any quantity to exceed the Noosphere, which OBL and all other entries on this wiki are irrefutably and pitifully bound to. And the other problem is that we can only theorize what exists in the thoughtrealm outside the Noosphere, which can only be done by using observationally-collapsed concepts. But what if we break the Noosphere itself, by finding the limit of the Noosphere? People out there believe that the limit of the Noosphere is Thoughtlock, because no level of PIL+ can be ascertained without establishing that an instance of PIL not contradicting all conceptions cannot happen. What I just paraphrased right here is the OBL entry itself, just to let you know.
Theory/Definition[]
IIS is the set of all systems that do not exist within the set of collapsed systems. There is no way to state this without creating a collapsed version of any perceivable qualia. However, the collapsed version of IIS is greater than the collapsed version of OBL. Do you know what that means? There is an uncollapsed version of IIS, which is impossible (take this with a grain of salt, because it's way more complicated than this) to the most irrevocable extent at any methodical level, that is greater than the uncollapsed version of OBL, and thus greater than the limit of the observational field. Although the page here represents the collapsed version of IIS and literally cannot match whatever we're attempting to define, and thus below the inferred uncollapsed OBL, we have just transcended the record holder.
Conclusion[]
Thinking back, when this wiki was at the starting point for mature argument (the battle of UTtDCAL, the Box, and when FG competed with other pseudofictional fields for supremacy), we were just beginning to understand how the philosophical side of FG worked. Today we have reached the end of such things, Neology, Transcology, Hyperology (which we'll ignore for now since it is apparent that the only one possessing actual coherent and accurate knowledge of the field is keeping themselves hold up in the backwaters of society for them and the people they can see... in the mirror), and so many more fields. But when something ends, there is definitely a point of opportunity when something can take off from that terminating point, and create something new.