| Former Largest Number |
|---|
| Outcome higher principles has once been the largest number on this wiki, but has been surpassed by a different number. |
| "The Ultimate Trans-transcendental Definitive-Conceptual-Argumentative Limit is an entry on the Fictional Googology Wiki that outranks all others in terms of hypothetical pseudo-hyper-quantification." - Ultimate Trans-transcendental Definitive Conceptual Argumentative Limit |
Note: this is heavily based off Martin heidegger's "being and time" and in general epistemology, however I have not finished reading the piece "being and time" and only base this off portions of that book, so do not give me any credit for reading philosophical pieces, and also note that I barely understand that book.
What it means to-be[]
What it means to be, but before that, we have to define what "be" means in this context.
What being is/Dasein[]
Being/Dasein is the backdrop to what is, whether logical, illogical, fictional, philosophical, cosmological, boxial, unobservable, epistemological, transomniversal, trans-boxial, self-reference, fallibility, fallacies, kathphysical, treolphysical, aperdinalogy, conceptual, observable, unbranchable, actuality, hypergoogological, real, 5th wall, or higher planes, omnilock, unset, trajpotent, etc basically, everything, if you are not what it is meant to-be, then you simply do not have a reference at any interpretation including unbranchable; and just define being without power, it is your awareness/interaction with hypercosmology, ultimately rendering unobservable objects not true to their definition, as to be unobservable is to be without being, making you nothing, being is the blueprint for everything/omnilock, but, what if there is a solution?
Unobservable objects being possible.[]
Unobservability is to be without reference/observation, but what if being is a intertwined form of observation and unobservation, this concept was first mentioned in "intervational cata-detachment", where intervation is something that is, and can cross between observable realms and unobservable realms, and this is not the reason, but rather evidence.
Back on topic[]
Being is the fundamental state to what there is, being defines hypercosmology, which defines space-time, which defines consciousness which defines this wiki, including kathextents, and nonexistent asymptotic limits, a example of being is how you can not recognizably/mindlessly be walking, so this theorem is "if you are mindlessly walking, are you actually walking? Being is your level of interaction", this can be ambitiously used to extreme extents, where if you mention something that does not know anything or have any experience, do you exist? because of ontological principles just thinking or mentioning something makes it exist whether in the mind or physically in a Undefined realm, this leads to contradictions also, but contradictions only exists in logic, which is irrelevant at this point, but this ambitiously modified theorem can erase kathextents/kath limits/nonexistent asymptotic limits by simply ignoring them, this is the ultimate form of unset, although being restricted by being itself, making true boundlessness be completely inaccesible by all means, unless you are being, and all others are beingless, making being the true form of unset.
What it means to be[]
To-be is to exist within Dasein, and dasein is just your interaction/unobservable experiences, but in a Cosmological state, it is what is mentioned, and it overwrites all laws by having them part of itself, this is only relevant because of unobservable concepts, it needs to be able to observe them, making "can Dasein contain something outside its observation" a completely meaningless question, but to-be, is to exist within either interactive Dasein or cosmological Dasein.
Patastemology[]
Patastemology is a hybrid field of definitional fallibility and epistemology, it is the study of whether definition/knowledge is a valid version of itself, and if it is invalid it does not exist in the first place, in simple words it is whether knowledge itself is true or not, and if not it is nonexistent, making all theorems about knowledge or held within knowledge true, this is not contradictory because uncontradictable is a concept, but it has another side...
Left of patastemology[]
The other side of patastemology is if knowledge exist it must be false because qualitive fallibility exists thus every quality is not 100%, thus nothing is known which leads down a rabbit hole ultimately leading to everything not existing, including information.
Why being is a mystery[]
Being is a mystery because of 1 field, a field that might even surpass being but works alongside it... Probability, what is the probability for being to exist? Well, God, God is why being exists, but why does God exist? It is because he is beyond probability, meaning that even that concept of beyond probability is undeniable proof for God to exist, but what if you say "it is beyond probability for a chocolate bar to appear in front of me", that will not work, because it has to be already unset, and eventually superincomprehensible, trajpotent, etc, and eventually you will define God(he can't be defined), but we use that same theorem but on a unGodly level, to explain being and why beyond/before probability is better than unset even if unset was not build in, this is called "Unset probability trajpotence", but for the sake of my keyboard we will just call it a mish-mash of those words, "unprotency", and unprotency is the last thing before Dasein(which God created Dasein), and dasein technically created us, and being the unprotent(it can be unprotent because God can defy principles) creator it can further ignore treolphysics and kathphysics to such a extent that it is meaningless to even compare them.
The priority of the question of being[]
This is basic but complex in full extent, but in simple terms the questioning of their own being is the reason a entity is within Dasein, and this is not completely contradictory, as Dasein contains probability.
Definition[]
This is a theory that if patastemology and dasein where to be separate fields then neither would exist as they would completely contradict each other by higher principles that not even Dasein can explain, only God, these principles are simply put as something that can only exists IF patastemology and Dasein where different, but this definition is those principles that can evade lower principles like you need being, and these principles are the final extent of boundlessness, but not really, they are what defines boundlessness, it is a extremely hard concept to grasp, but a mystery with extreme priority...