"When any like a mind or a characteristic is with the way to the Nothing..., they get broken off and invalided. The Nothing is not whether it says or would be."
Analysis[]
"The Nothing..." is well, you guess it.
Not a thing.
Even any (including "us") were talking, defining, and predicting about "The Nothing..." is invalid. Any way to "The Nothing..." (including the definition) is invalided, making it genuinely and verifiably impossible to reach and surpass. Not even the gods of this wiki can surpass it.
Comparison to Infinite Sets[]
"The Nothing..." is invalidated to be in any Infinite Set reflexing of "things" or "any." Being paradoxically out, "any" (including "size" and "we") is absolutely and completely ineffable to it.
Comparison to Asymptotes[]
"The Nothing..." can't be reached with a C.H.A.R.M system through asymptotes of objects. Any H.I.G.G.S system can't non-paradoxically escape to it.
Comparison to Istamtae's pata-[]
Istamtae's pata- is defined "The imaginary from any viewpoint." Given any referential point, there are pseudo-things hypothesizible and/or imaginable by such viewpoints disregarding "what."
However, some are logically or verifiably impossible and some would give imaginary objects fitting within any viewpoint or method.
Viewpoints for imaginary versions of "The Nothing..." are actually false representations, given from any to do it so but broken.
Continuing from this point[]
I like to appreciate how far we came. Realizing "paradoxically outside" concept is discovered during the research of Number Fallout and Dequalificate Ologica. The journey seems to be over since the conclusion, but we kept going that makes no sense anymore.